|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Most-wanted Tech | |||
Warp dive/hyperdrive/jump gates/whatever 
|
   
|
2 | 20.00% |
Tricorders (whir whir whir  )
|
  
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Hyposprays (the real kind, not those tanks and hoses) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| PADDs (we know they can do more than Palmpilots) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Transporters (one that works) |
  
|
2 | 20.00% |
| Replicators (tea, Earl Grey, hot) |
  
|
4 | 40.00% |
| Commbadges (chirping optional) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Lightsabres (I see your Swartz is as big as mine) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Phasers (so we can blink them to death) |
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Cybernetic eyes (VISORs can look tacky) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
12-20-2006, 08:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That's a nice story, but his methods were unscientific. Nobody else can replicate or calibrate a similar thermometer, which makes it useless as a scientific instrument.
The story I heard in one of my chem classes was that 0 was "an average winter's day in Vienna", Fahrenheit being Austrian, and 100 was his body temperature (he must have been running a fever that day, given that healathy human body temperature is 98.6 F). Given the fact that he's been dead for a century and a half and global warming has ensured that winter in Vienna now is not the same as winter in Vienna in the mid nineteenth century, we still can't replicate either of these reference points.
__________________
The first run through of any experimental procedure is to identify any potential errors by making them. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode