#1
|
|||
|
|||
[color=#000000ost_uid0]Hey guys, I'm back and hotter than ever.
:suspicious: Oooookay. Anyone else use Phoenix/Firebird or any other Mozilla based browser? On the main 5MV page the section icons go from big (left) to small (right). Not that it matters, but does anyone else have this problem? I tried the page in AOL and it came out fine. learn their lesson I know Microsoft owns 5MV, but you'd think they'd learn their lesson from the Opera Bork thing....[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Oh, i\'m back. Really! This time, for sure. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
[color=#000000ost_uid0]I think it's supposed to be like that. It works like that for me with Netscape, but not I. Explorer (or, just maybe, it's the other way around). [/colorost_uid0]
__________________
My 5MV webpages My novel fivers list Yup “There must have been a point in early human history when it was actually advantageous to, when confronted with a difficult task, drop it altogether and go do something more fun, because I do that way too often for it to be anything but instinct.” -- Isto Combs |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
[color=#000000ost_uid0]Yeah, I noted that ... idiosyncrasy myself. Before the boards were purged, I had posted an explanation because I (ever the geek) took the effort of figuring out why that happens. And because I (still ever the geek) am bored, here's the explanation again.
If you've read enough Mozilla propoganda, then you won't be surprised by my saying that Mozilla's implementation is the correct one. Here's why (relevant portions from 5MV's front page):
The key is "width=15%". According to the W3C standards, the width attribute on an image tag says, "scale the width of the image to 15% of the remaining width of the page". This is what Mozilla does. However, IE and others read width=15% to mean "scale the width of the image to 15% of the width of the page". One word difference and yet what a difference. (Worth noting that both implementations keep the aspect ratio of the images, so the height gets scaled as well as the width.) So if your browser is 1000 pixels wide, then here's what the width of the second row of images on 5MV's front page work out to be: [bost_uid0]IE and others[/bost_uid0] 5MD image = 15% * 1000 px = 150 px 5MS image = 15% * 1000 px = 150 px 5MVG image = 15% * 1000 px = 150 px 5MSF image = 15% * 1000px = 150 px 5MF image = 15% * 1000px = 150 px [bost_uid0]Mozilla (and other Gecko-based browsers)[/bost_uid0] 5MD image = 15% * 1000 px = 150 px 5MS image = 15% * (1000 px-150 px) = 127.5 px 5MVG image = 15% * (1000 px-150 px-127.5 px) = 108.375 px 5MSF image = 15% * (1000 px-50 px-127.5 px-108.375 px) = 92.11875 px 5MF image = 15% * (1000 px-150 px-127.5 px-108.375 px-92.11875 px) = 78.3009375 px So as you can see, Mozilla shrinks the images smaller and smaller until the fifth image is nearly half the first because it calculates 15% from the percentage of the width [iost_uid0]remaining[/iost_uid0] while other browsers just calculate it from the precentage of the [iost_uid0]total[/iost_uid0] width every time. Well, [iost_uid0]I[/iost_uid0] find it interesting.[/colorost_uid0]
__________________
"Please, Aslan," said Lucy, "what do you call soon?" "I call all times soon," said Aslan; and instantly he vanished away and Lucy was alone with the Magician. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
[color=#000000ost_uid0]Well, I generally dont use Mozilla when looking on here, as it may show some er... strange info in the visitor stats, however after reading this I had to try it.
Must say I love the correct way of interpreting it. As the image on the right always come out as the smallest, (and I mean every right hand image! ) I think I'll be using Moz on here more often! [/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Entei-rah I have a signature under construction... but you know what contractors are like! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[color=#000000ost_uid0]HeHe! I'm using your funny version of Mozilla now Entei. [/colorost_uid0]
__________________
Insert witty retort or remark here. |
|
|