|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Most-wanted Tech | |||
Warp dive/hyperdrive/jump gates/whatever 
|
   
|
2 | 20.00% |
Tricorders (whir whir whir  )
|
  
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Hyposprays (the real kind, not those tanks and hoses) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| PADDs (we know they can do more than Palmpilots) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Transporters (one that works) |
  
|
2 | 20.00% |
| Replicators (tea, Earl Grey, hot) |
  
|
4 | 40.00% |
| Commbadges (chirping optional) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Lightsabres (I see your Swartz is as big as mine) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Phasers (so we can blink them to death) |
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Cybernetic eyes (VISORs can look tacky) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
12-04-2006, 12:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Uh, I don't think it's that easy. Even replicators can't be a hundred percent effective, even if everything they create gets recycled, which it's not. You'll still need an external power source.
I'd never set foot in a Holodeck capable of malfunction. I'd seriously still wait a few years for everyone else to beta test the thing. Haven't you ever heard of industrial replicators? They're big, but they quickly become less power efficient as the replicated mass increases. I assume this is because greater distances mean more work for the targeting scanners and related equipment.
__________________
mudshark: Nate's just being...Nate. Zeke: It comes nateurally to him. mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really -- it's just a bad idea. Sa'ar Chasm on the 5M.net forum: Sit back, relax, and revel in the insanity. Adam Savage: I reject your reality and substitute my own! Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Crow T. Robot: Oh, stop pretending there's a plot. Don't cheapen yourself further. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode