![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
ops: even though there are plenty here who fit it perfectly.) Blanket statements (e.g., California consists entirely of movie stars and broad sandy beaches, and everyone who lives there is a tree-hugging lefty) about things as large as states, countries or political parties are generally not terribly accurate. Interesting illustrations -- 2004 presidential election results: State-by-state -- Oklahoma red, California blue, right? Now ... County-by-county -- Oklahoma still red, California looking not nearly so blue. But ... County, shaded for percentage margin -- hmmm, not quite such a clear difference any more, is there?. So much for the Us-and-Them state some of our political "experts" and party leaders would have us believe exists. These, and some other very interesting representations of statistical slicing & dicing, are from: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/
__________________
Methinks Ted Sturgeon was too kind. 'Yes, but I think some people should be offended.' -- John Cleese (on whether he thought some might be offended by Monty Python) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|