Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kira
Not that it really matters -- odds are excellent that this film is going to suck. Hard. Just like its two predecessors. (And unlike Batman Begins, Zeke.)
|
Hey, I'll be delighted if it doesn't suck -- I'm just saying the recent history isn't promising. But I've been wrong before. I wasn't optimistic about
Spider-Man 2, which turned out to be the best thing ever.
Tangent: Why must all movies have sequels?
The Matrix was complete in itself and needed no followup; from what I've heard of the sequels, they mostly just diminished the original. It seems every movie that's popular enough, no matter how conclusive the ending is (don't get certain people started on
Shrek 2), either has a sequel already or has one being planned. I'm just saying if I start hearing about
Majority Report, I'm outta here.
Back on topic, I think
Revenge of the Sith kicks all possible titular @$$. It just fits so well. The only question is what the Sith are getting revenge
for -- is there some past defeat we as moviegoers should know about? (And why couldn't George Lucas have started thinking along these lines sooner? Episode II could have been called
The Republic Strikes Out or something, and the
AI research community would have been spared....)
__________________
FiveMinute.net: because stuff is long and life is short
[03:17]
FiveMinZeke: Galactica clearly needs the advanced technology of
scissors, which get around the whole "yanking on your follicles" problem.
[03:17]
IJD: cylons can hack any blades working in conjunction