New Dr Who Companion
For those who haven't heard:
* BBC announcement * Outpost Gallifrey report At least we already got to see the actor in "Army of Ghosts", so she's not a complete mystery. Interestingly enough, Martha is not supposed to debut until the first ep of season 3, which I guess will therefore probably be a character intro ep like "Rose". So the 2006 Christmas special (which they've already started filming) will feature a "guest" companion, possibly introduced in today's episode. I guess we'll know in a few hours. It's gonna be a long wait until Christmas and next spring. |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/martha/800/3.jpg
So just what the heck is DT wearing, anyway? What, is he dressed up for a vacation on Risa? |
well then guess where those two are travelling to first ;)
|
Quote:
|
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
We'll see. |
I would just love to see the Doctor wear that shirt, the Daleks would be pissing themselves.
My first post here btw, great to finally join the Fiveminute.net forums! |
Quote:
|
Hey there Grayvorn! Hows things? Don't worry about the Chancellor. When it comes to RTD he seems to have a 'to the death' thing going. Best avoid mentioning 'Love and monsters' too.... Oh Crap......
uuummmmm uuuummmmm MACBETH! |
Quote:
re: RTD, nahh...I'll give it up when he produces something that isn't a waste of 45 minutes of my life. |
For me, everything RTD has delivered has been immensely entertaining, only 'The Long Game' was a bit dodgy.
|
Yay, new people!
I'm starting to wonder if David Tennant has been borrowing ideas from Connor Trineer, or if it's just sci-fi policy for actors of offbeat characters to wear amazingly loud shirts. |
I became rather fond of Rose in the three or so episodes i've managed to see now. :(
|
Whoops, didn't notice the new member. Welcome, Grayvorn!
Valium: Is an episode really a waste of 45 minutes of your life if you then go on to spend much more than 45 minutes talking about it? |
Zeke: Nope. 'Cause that way, you've gotten a net waste of more then 90 minutes or less then 0, depending on whether you consider the talk to be a waste, too. Either way, it isn't 45.
|
Of course not. It's 47. Or 42, depending on which you prefer.
|
Welcome, new member! You know, this means fresh organs for us all. It's been a while since we had any of those to sell.
I call dibs on the Human Horn! |
You want their *nose*? *sighs* you're as bad as the Omicronians...
|
Those guys will pay top dollar for that sort of thing, you know.
|
I've had to explain 47 way too often, lately. :(
|
I've found the simplest way to explain 47 is to say that "it's the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything, adjusted for inflation." Yeah, it's a direct ripoff of a Sev Trek punchline, but I find it more satisfying and concise than "several Trek creators are Pomona University graduates, and 47 is an in-joke."
|
Quote:
@Inf/Imp: It's also blasphemy. Recant! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.